🔗 Share this article

The Australian bold policy to restrict social media access for individuals under sixteen is sparking debate around the globe. Officials, campaigners, and guardians are watching closely to see if this tactic will become a template for the rest of the world.

Across Europe Momentum

Across Europe, a growing group of nations are considering comparable measures.

• The Danish government plans a ban on social media for children under fifteen, with the leader declaring that phones and platforms are "stealing our kids' innocence". The policy is expected to be passed in the coming year.
• Norway is planning to enforce a access barrier of 15, citing the need to protect children from the "manipulative force of the AI".
• Ireland is introducing a online verification tool to authenticate the age and identity of social media account holders. The media minister have indicated that an similar ban remains "a potential options on the table".
• In Spain, the president has urged lawmakers to pass a bill lifting the access age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has floated the idea of a ban for under-15s, and a parliamentary commission has endorsed a similar step, including an overnight "digital curfew" for older teenagers.
• The administration in The Netherlands has advised guardians to restrict their youngsters from social media before 15.

Across the European Union, the EU parliament has approved a symbolic motion demanding a ban for teenagers under 16 except if a parent decides otherwise is given. While it cautions of the "compulsive" design of these platforms, the resolution does not establish mandatory rules.

"An effective age limit is a useful starting point," commented one parliamentarian supporting the measure.

The UK: A Watchful Eye

Across Britain, the administration has remained open to a potential ban, emphasizing that "nothing is discarded" but maintaining any decision must be "supported by conclusive evidence".

Earlier, momentum grew behind a legislative effort to enact controls on social media use by minors, but it was in the end modified. Nonetheless, the government pledged to investigate the issue.

Advocacy groups have raised warnings. One foundation set up by the relatives of a teenager who was lost after being exposed to harmful online content contends that a strict age ban could fail to protect children and could result in a "dangerous transition" of exposure when young people become eligible.

"The Australian ban is a reaction to the inability of the tech sector to design platforms and apps that are secure and fit for young users," commented a prominent peer.

America: A Fragmented Landscape

In the United States, action is mostly happening at the state government level against a backdrop of federal inaction.

• Utah demands parental consent for minors to use social media and restricts late-night use.
• Florida has signed a bill barring under-14s from accessing social media, though it is subject to court battles.
• Virginia has passed a law limiting teenagers to 60 minutes of social media access per day, with extra access needing adult consent.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly enacted bills mandating adult authorization for teenagers to set up social media presences.

Despite bipartisan support and calls from various individuals to copy this lead, a federal ban is currently seen as unlikely.

International Outlook

Beyond these regions, other countries are similarly considering moves.

• Malaysia plans to ban social media for those under sixteen beginning next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has increased the access age for Instagram to 16.

However, international organizations strike a more nuanced tone. A major UN agency has warned that age-based restrictions carry risks and "might prove counterproductive". The body points out that the internet can be a "critical link" for marginalized youth and that government action should not be a "substitute" for social media firms to improve child safeguards.

As this global debate unfolds, the steps of this nation and its followers demonstrate that governments internationally are increasingly willing to wait for the industry to act voluntarily.